• About
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
Sunday, June 15, 2025
Cyber Defense GO
  • Login
  • Home
  • Cyber Security
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Data Analysis
  • Computer Networking
  • Disaster Restoration
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Cyber Security
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Data Analysis
  • Computer Networking
  • Disaster Restoration
No Result
View All Result
Cyber Defense Go
No Result
View All Result
Home Computer Networking

vpn – Routing all web site visitors of a wireguard consumer via one other wireguard consumer

Md Sazzad Hossain by Md Sazzad Hossain
0
community – F5 Failing SSL Handshake After “Consumer Good day”
585
SHARES
3.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Closed. This query is off-topic. It isn’t at present accepting solutions.


NE is a website for to ask and supply solutions about professionally managed networks in a enterprise atmosphere. Your query falls exterior the areas our group determined are on subject. Please go to the assist heart for extra particulars. If you happen to disagree with this closure, please ask on Community Engineering Meta.

Drawback Assertion:

I’ve two homes (House1 and House2) linked by way of a WireGuard VPN setup, with routers performing as intermediaries. I must configure the community so that each one internet-bound site visitors from a laptop computer in House2 routes via House1’s web connection (particularly RouterA’s public IP).

You might also like

Detailed Comparability » Community Interview

Addressing Vulnerabilities in Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Companies

Powering All Ethernet AI Networking

Present Community Setup:

  • House1:
    • RouterA is linked to the ISP and gives web entry.
    • LAN_A (linked to RouterA) accommodates native units that may be accessed from the House2 laptop computer.
    • RouterB is linked to RouterA and runs the WireGuard consumer, connecting to the WireGuard server in House2.
    • RouterB gives entry to LAN_B (linked to RouterB) and permits the House2 laptop computer to entry each LAN_A and LAN_B.
  • House2:
    • Brume2 acts because the WireGuard server.
    • The House2 laptop computer connects to Brume2 via the WireGuard consumer and might entry LAN_A (RouterA’s LAN) and LAN_B (RouterB’s LAN).

Purpose:

I wish to route all internet-bound site visitors from the House2 laptop computer via House1’s web connection (by way of RouterA) in order that the laptop computer’s web site visitors seems as if it’s coming from House1’s public IP (i.e., RouterA’s public IP).

Presently, the House2 laptop computer can entry each LAN_A and LAN_B, however its web site visitors just isn’t routed via House1. I want to regulate the configuration so that each one site visitors from the House2 laptop computer makes use of RouterA’s public IP for web entry whereas sustaining entry to LAN_A and LAN_B.


Community Diagram:

                              +-------------------+
                              |   Laptop computer in House2 |
                              |   (WireGuard Consumer)|
                              +----------+--------+
                                         |
                                         | WireGuard Tunnel (House2 to House1)
                                         |
                    +--------------------+--------------------+
                    |                                        |
         +----------v----------+                      +------v-------+
         |   Brume2 (House2)   |                      |   RouterB    |
         | (WireGuard Server)   |                      | (WireGuard   |
         |                      |<-------------------->|   Consumer)    |
         +----------+-----------+                      | (Linked to |
                    |                                  |   RouterA)   |
                    |                                  +--------+------+
         +----------v-----------+                               |
         | LAN_B (RouterB's LAN)|                               |
         | (Gadgets in House1)  |                               |
         +----------------------+                               |
                    |                                          |
            +-------v--------+                        +--------v---------+
            |   RouterA      |                        |  Web (House1)|
            | (Linked to  |                        | (House1's ISP)    |
            |    ISP)        |                        +-------------------+
            +--------+-------+
                     |
                     | Entry to LAN_A (Gadgets in House1)
            +--------v--------+
            | LAN_A (RouterA's|
            | Native Community)  |
            | (Gadgets in     |
            | House1)         |
            +-----------------+

Abstract:

  • RouterA gives each web entry and LAN_A (native community in House1).
  • RouterB is working the WireGuard consumer and is linked to RouterA, offering entry to each LAN_A and LAN_B (native community in House2).
  • The House2 laptop computer can entry each LAN_A and LAN_B via the WireGuard VPN.
  • The target is to route all web site visitors from the House2 laptop computer via House1’s web connection, making it seem as if the web site visitors is coming from House1’s public IP.

What I examined up to now:-

If set a static route in Brume2 for IPV4 to as follows
goal:192.168.33.0/24 gateway 10.0.12.52 (wireguard consumer IP house1)
goal: 192.168.44.0/24 gateway 10.0.12.52 (wireguard consumer IP house1)

If I do the above in brume2 which is working wireguard server in house2 I’m able to attain each LAN-A and LAN-B as in diagram

If I set the route on the House2 Brume2 WireGuard server as follows, with the general public IP addresses of www.whatismyipadress.com (104.19.222.79 and 104.19.223.79), that are the general public IPs for that web site, then the state of affairs adjustments. Once I configure this on the House2 Brume2 WireGuard server, and if I exploit a laptop computer in House2 (with WireGuard consumer working), once I sort www.whatismyipadress.com in Chrome, it reveals the House1 public IP as a substitute of the House2 public IP. This makes me consider that the House1 router is aware of tips on how to resolve web addresses.

Now, what I need assistance with is instructing the Brume2 WireGuard server at House2 to route all site visitors from the WireGuard laptop computer consumer (with IP 10.0.12.32) to 10.0.12.52 (the House1 WireGuard consumer IP) because the gateway. Basically, I would like the Brume2 server to deal with any site visitors originating solely from the laptop computer consumer and route it to the House1 WireGuard consumer working on the router (exit node for laptop computer in house2).

Tags: ClientInternetroutingTrafficVPNwireguard
Previous Post

🌱 Constructing GoalSpotter: Orchestrating a Mesop App with 4 Cog Containers to Detect Sustainability Aims | by Tuba Karaca | Apr, 2025

Next Post

Constructing Nice Managers for Scalable Enterprise Progress

Md Sazzad Hossain

Md Sazzad Hossain

Related Posts

Detailed Comparability » Community Interview
Computer Networking

Detailed Comparability » Community Interview

by Md Sazzad Hossain
June 15, 2025
Addressing Vulnerabilities in Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Companies
Computer Networking

Addressing Vulnerabilities in Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Companies

by Md Sazzad Hossain
June 14, 2025
Powering All Ethernet AI Networking
Computer Networking

Powering All Ethernet AI Networking

by Md Sazzad Hossain
June 14, 2025
5G is Shifting Downstream to Enterprises
Computer Networking

5G is Shifting Downstream to Enterprises

by Md Sazzad Hossain
June 14, 2025
That is Extending to GreenOps – IT Connection
Computer Networking

AWS Summit Sydney – Accelerating AI from Prospects to Manufacturing – IT Connection

by Md Sazzad Hossain
June 13, 2025
Next Post
Constructing Nice Managers for Scalable Enterprise Progress

Constructing Nice Managers for Scalable Enterprise Progress

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

AI-Powered Gross sales Automation: Enhance Income and Effectivity

AI-Powered Gross sales Automation: Enhance Income and Effectivity

March 26, 2025
Empowering the following era for an AI-enabled world

Empowering the following era for an AI-enabled world

May 6, 2025

Categories

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networking
  • Cyber Security
  • Data Analysis
  • Disaster Restoration
  • Machine Learning

CyberDefenseGo

Welcome to CyberDefenseGo. We are a passionate team of technology enthusiasts, cybersecurity experts, and AI innovators dedicated to delivering high-quality, insightful content that helps individuals and organizations stay ahead of the ever-evolving digital landscape.

Recent

Predicting Insurance coverage Prices with Linear Regression

Predicting Insurance coverage Prices with Linear Regression

June 15, 2025
Detailed Comparability » Community Interview

Detailed Comparability » Community Interview

June 15, 2025

Search

No Result
View All Result

© 2025 CyberDefenseGo - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Cyber Security
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Data Analysis
  • Computer Networking
  • Disaster Restoration

© 2025 CyberDefenseGo - All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In