A Minnesota cybersecurity and laptop forensics skilled whose testimony has featured in 1000’s of courtroom trials over the previous 30 years is dealing with questions on his credentials and an inquiry from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Authorized consultants say the inquiry could possibly be grounds to reopen quite a few adjudicated instances by which the skilled’s testimony could have been pivotal.
One would possibly conclude from studying Mr. Lanterman’s LinkedIn profile that has a level from Harvard College.
Mark Lanterman is a former investigator for the U.S. Secret Service Electronics Crimes Job Pressure who based the Minneapolis consulting agency Laptop Forensic Providers (CFS). The CFS web site says Lanterman’s 30-year profession has seen him testify as an skilled in additional than 2,000 instances, with expertise in instances involving sexual harassment and office claims, theft of mental property and commerce secrets and techniques, white-collar crime, and sophistication motion lawsuits.
Or at the least it did till final month, when Lanterman’s profile and work historical past have been quietly faraway from the CFS web site. The elimination got here after Hennepin County Lawyer’s Workplace mentioned it was notifying events to 10 pending instances that they have been unable to confirm Lanterman’s instructional and employment background. The county legal professional additionally mentioned the FBI is now investigating the allegations.
These allegations have been raised by Sean Harrington, an legal professional and forensics examiner based mostly in Prescott, Wisconsin. Harrington alleged that Lanterman lied underneath oath in courtroom on a number of events when he testified that he has a Bachelor of Science and a Grasp’s diploma in laptop science from the now-defunct Upsala Faculty, and that he accomplished his postgraduate work in cybersecurity at Harvard College.
Harrington’s claims gained steam due to digging by the regulation agency Perkins Coie LLP, which is defending a case whereby a shopper’s laptop computer was forensically reviewed by Lanterman. On March 14, Perkins Coie attorneys requested the choose (PDF) to strike Lanterman’s testimony as a result of neither he nor they may substantiate claims about his instructional background.
Upsala Faculty, positioned in East Orange, N.J., operated for 102 years till it closed in 1995 after a interval of declining enrollment and monetary difficulties. Perkins Coie advised the courtroom that they’d visited Felician College, which holds the transcripts for Upsala Faculty in the course of the years Lanterman claimed to have earned undergraduate and graduate levels. The regulation agency mentioned Felician had no report of transcripts for Lanterman (PDF), and that his title was absent from all the Upsala Faculty scholar yearbooks and graduation applications throughout that interval.
Reached for remark, Lanterman acknowledged he had no technique to show he attended Upsala Faculty, and that his “postgraduate work” at Harvard was in actual fact an eight-week on-line cybersecurity class referred to as HarvardX, which cautions that its certificates shouldn’t be thought of equal to a Harvard diploma or a certificates earned via conventional, in-person applications at Harvard College.
Lanterman has testified that his first job after school was serving as a police officer in Springfield Township, Pennsylvania, though the Perkins Coie attorneys famous that this position was omitted from his resume. The attorneys mentioned after they tried to confirm Lanterman’s work historical past, “the police division responded with a narrative that may be nearly not possible to consider if it was not corroborated by Lanterman’s personal e mail communications.”
As recounted within the March 14 submitting, Lanterman was deposed on Feb. 11, and the next day he emailed the Springfield Township Police Division to see if he might have a peek at his outdated personnel file. On Feb. 14, Lanterman visited the Springfield Township PD and requested to borrow his employment report. He advised the officer he spoke with on the telephone that he’d just lately been instructed to “get his affairs so as” after being identified with a grave coronary heart situation, and that he needed his outdated file to point out his household about his early profession.
In line with Perkins Coie, Lanterman left the Springfield Township PD along with his personnel file, and has not returned it as promised.
“It’s stunning that an skilled from Minnesota would journey to suburban Philadelphia and abscond along with his decades-old personnel file to obscure his background,” the regulation agency wrote. “That seems to be the worst and most egregious type of spoliation, and the deception alone is motive sufficient to exclude Lanterman and think about sanctions.”
Harrington initially contacted KrebsOnSecurity about his issues in late 2023, fuming after sitting via a convention speech by which Lanterman shared paperwork from a ransomware sufferer and advised attendees it was as a result of they’d refused to rent his firm to carry out a forensic investigation on a latest breach.
“He claims he was concerned within the Martha Stewart investigation, the Bernie Madoff trial, Paul McCartney’s divorce, the Tom Petters investigation, the Denny Hecker investigation, and plenty of others,” Harrington mentioned. “He claims to have been invited to talk to the Supreme Court docket, claims to coach the ‘complete federal judiciary’ on cybersecurity yearly, and is a college member of the US Judicial Convention and the Judicial Faculty — positions which he obtained, partly, on a home of fraudulent playing cards.”
In an interview this week, Harrington mentioned courtroom paperwork reveal that at the least two of Lanterman’s earlier purchasers complained CFS had held their knowledge for ransom over billing disputes. In a declaration (PDF) dated August 2022, the co-founder of the regulation agency MoreLaw Minneapolis LLC mentioned she employed Lanterman in 2014 to look at a number of digital units after studying that considered one of their paralegals had a prison fraud historical past.
However the regulation agency mentioned when it pushed again on a consulting invoice that was far larger than anticipated, Lanterman advised them CFS would “escalate” its assortment efforts in the event that they didn’t pay, together with “a declare and lien in opposition to the information which is able to end in a public public sale of your knowledge.”
“All of us have been flabbergasted by Mr. Lanterman’s e mail,” wrote MoreLaw co-founder Kimberly Hanlon. “I had by no means heard of any professional forensic firm threatening to ‘public sale’ off an legal professional’s knowledge, significantly understanding that the information is comprised of confidential shopper knowledge, a lot of which is delicate in nature.”
In 2009, a Wisconsin-based manufacturing firm that had employed Lanterman for laptop forensics balked at paying an $86,000 bill from CFS, calling it “extreme and unsubstantiated.” The corporate advised a Hennepin County courtroom that on April 15, 2009, CFS carried out an public sale of its commerce secret data in violation of their confidentiality settlement.
“CFS seen and carried out a Public Sale of digital data that was entrusted to them pursuant to the phrases of the engagement settlement,” the corporate wrote. “CFS submitted the very best bid on the Public Sale within the quantity of $10,000.”
Lanterman briefly responded to a listing of questions on his background (and up to date coronary heart prognosis) on March 24, saying he would ship detailed replies the next day. These replies by no means materialized. As a substitute, Lanterman forwarded a latest memo he wrote to the courtroom that attacked Harrington and mentioned his accuser was solely attempting to take out a competitor. He has not responded to additional requests for remark.
“Once I attended Upsala, I used to be a commuter scholar who lived with my grandparents in Morristown, New Jersey roughly half-hour away from Upsala Faculty,” Lanterman defined to the choose (PDF) overseeing a separate ongoing case (PDF) by which he has testified. “With restricted assets, I didn’t take part in campus social occasions, nor did I attend commencement ceremonies. In 2023, I confirmed with Felician College — which maintains Upsala Faculty’s data — that they may not find my transcripts or diploma, a scenario that they indicated was probably on account of unresolved money-related points.”
Lanterman was ordered to look in courtroom on April 3 within the case defended by Perkins Coie, however he didn’t present up. As a substitute, he despatched a message to the choose withdrawing from the case.
“I’m 60 years outdated,” Lanterman advised the choose. “I created my enterprise from nothing. I’m accomplished coping with the likes of people like Sean Harrington. And fairly frankly, I’ve been planning at turning over my enterprise to my kids for years. That point has arrived.”
Lanterman’s letter leaves the impression that it was his choice to retire. However in line with an affidavit (PDF) filed in a Florida case on March 28, Mark Lanterman’s son Sean mentioned he’d made the troublesome choice to ask his dad to step down given all of the damaging media consideration.
Mark Rasch, a former federal cybercrime prosecutor who now serves as counsel to the New York cybersecurity intelligence agency Unit 221B, mentioned that if an skilled witness is discredited, any defendants who misplaced instances that have been strongly influenced by that skilled’s conclusions at trial might have grounds for attraction.
Rasch mentioned regulation corporations who suggest an skilled witness have an obligation in good religion to vet that skilled’s {qualifications}, understanding that these credentials can be topic to cross-examination.
“Federal guidelines of civil process and proof each require consultants to record each case they’ve testified in as an skilled for the previous few years,” Rasch mentioned. “A part of that due diligence is pulling up the outcomes of these instances and seeing what the character of their testimony has been.”
Maybe essentially the most well-publicized case involving vital forensic findings from Lanterman was the 2018 conviction of Stephen Allwine, who was discovered responsible of killing his spouse two years earlier after makes an attempt at hiring a hitman on the darkish web fell via. Allwine is serving a sentence of life in jail, and continues to take care of that he was framed, casting doubt on laptop forensic proof discovered on 64 digital units taken from his dwelling.
On March 24, Allwine petitioned a Minnesota courtroom (PDF) to revisit his case, citing the accusations in opposition to Lanterman and his position as a key witness for the prosecution.
A Minnesota cybersecurity and laptop forensics skilled whose testimony has featured in 1000’s of courtroom trials over the previous 30 years is dealing with questions on his credentials and an inquiry from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Authorized consultants say the inquiry could possibly be grounds to reopen quite a few adjudicated instances by which the skilled’s testimony could have been pivotal.
One would possibly conclude from studying Mr. Lanterman’s LinkedIn profile that has a level from Harvard College.
Mark Lanterman is a former investigator for the U.S. Secret Service Electronics Crimes Job Pressure who based the Minneapolis consulting agency Laptop Forensic Providers (CFS). The CFS web site says Lanterman’s 30-year profession has seen him testify as an skilled in additional than 2,000 instances, with expertise in instances involving sexual harassment and office claims, theft of mental property and commerce secrets and techniques, white-collar crime, and sophistication motion lawsuits.
Or at the least it did till final month, when Lanterman’s profile and work historical past have been quietly faraway from the CFS web site. The elimination got here after Hennepin County Lawyer’s Workplace mentioned it was notifying events to 10 pending instances that they have been unable to confirm Lanterman’s instructional and employment background. The county legal professional additionally mentioned the FBI is now investigating the allegations.
These allegations have been raised by Sean Harrington, an legal professional and forensics examiner based mostly in Prescott, Wisconsin. Harrington alleged that Lanterman lied underneath oath in courtroom on a number of events when he testified that he has a Bachelor of Science and a Grasp’s diploma in laptop science from the now-defunct Upsala Faculty, and that he accomplished his postgraduate work in cybersecurity at Harvard College.
Harrington’s claims gained steam due to digging by the regulation agency Perkins Coie LLP, which is defending a case whereby a shopper’s laptop computer was forensically reviewed by Lanterman. On March 14, Perkins Coie attorneys requested the choose (PDF) to strike Lanterman’s testimony as a result of neither he nor they may substantiate claims about his instructional background.
Upsala Faculty, positioned in East Orange, N.J., operated for 102 years till it closed in 1995 after a interval of declining enrollment and monetary difficulties. Perkins Coie advised the courtroom that they’d visited Felician College, which holds the transcripts for Upsala Faculty in the course of the years Lanterman claimed to have earned undergraduate and graduate levels. The regulation agency mentioned Felician had no report of transcripts for Lanterman (PDF), and that his title was absent from all the Upsala Faculty scholar yearbooks and graduation applications throughout that interval.
Reached for remark, Lanterman acknowledged he had no technique to show he attended Upsala Faculty, and that his “postgraduate work” at Harvard was in actual fact an eight-week on-line cybersecurity class referred to as HarvardX, which cautions that its certificates shouldn’t be thought of equal to a Harvard diploma or a certificates earned via conventional, in-person applications at Harvard College.
Lanterman has testified that his first job after school was serving as a police officer in Springfield Township, Pennsylvania, though the Perkins Coie attorneys famous that this position was omitted from his resume. The attorneys mentioned after they tried to confirm Lanterman’s work historical past, “the police division responded with a narrative that may be nearly not possible to consider if it was not corroborated by Lanterman’s personal e mail communications.”
As recounted within the March 14 submitting, Lanterman was deposed on Feb. 11, and the next day he emailed the Springfield Township Police Division to see if he might have a peek at his outdated personnel file. On Feb. 14, Lanterman visited the Springfield Township PD and requested to borrow his employment report. He advised the officer he spoke with on the telephone that he’d just lately been instructed to “get his affairs so as” after being identified with a grave coronary heart situation, and that he needed his outdated file to point out his household about his early profession.
In line with Perkins Coie, Lanterman left the Springfield Township PD along with his personnel file, and has not returned it as promised.
“It’s stunning that an skilled from Minnesota would journey to suburban Philadelphia and abscond along with his decades-old personnel file to obscure his background,” the regulation agency wrote. “That seems to be the worst and most egregious type of spoliation, and the deception alone is motive sufficient to exclude Lanterman and think about sanctions.”
Harrington initially contacted KrebsOnSecurity about his issues in late 2023, fuming after sitting via a convention speech by which Lanterman shared paperwork from a ransomware sufferer and advised attendees it was as a result of they’d refused to rent his firm to carry out a forensic investigation on a latest breach.
“He claims he was concerned within the Martha Stewart investigation, the Bernie Madoff trial, Paul McCartney’s divorce, the Tom Petters investigation, the Denny Hecker investigation, and plenty of others,” Harrington mentioned. “He claims to have been invited to talk to the Supreme Court docket, claims to coach the ‘complete federal judiciary’ on cybersecurity yearly, and is a college member of the US Judicial Convention and the Judicial Faculty — positions which he obtained, partly, on a home of fraudulent playing cards.”
In an interview this week, Harrington mentioned courtroom paperwork reveal that at the least two of Lanterman’s earlier purchasers complained CFS had held their knowledge for ransom over billing disputes. In a declaration (PDF) dated August 2022, the co-founder of the regulation agency MoreLaw Minneapolis LLC mentioned she employed Lanterman in 2014 to look at a number of digital units after studying that considered one of their paralegals had a prison fraud historical past.
However the regulation agency mentioned when it pushed again on a consulting invoice that was far larger than anticipated, Lanterman advised them CFS would “escalate” its assortment efforts in the event that they didn’t pay, together with “a declare and lien in opposition to the information which is able to end in a public public sale of your knowledge.”
“All of us have been flabbergasted by Mr. Lanterman’s e mail,” wrote MoreLaw co-founder Kimberly Hanlon. “I had by no means heard of any professional forensic firm threatening to ‘public sale’ off an legal professional’s knowledge, significantly understanding that the information is comprised of confidential shopper knowledge, a lot of which is delicate in nature.”
In 2009, a Wisconsin-based manufacturing firm that had employed Lanterman for laptop forensics balked at paying an $86,000 bill from CFS, calling it “extreme and unsubstantiated.” The corporate advised a Hennepin County courtroom that on April 15, 2009, CFS carried out an public sale of its commerce secret data in violation of their confidentiality settlement.
“CFS seen and carried out a Public Sale of digital data that was entrusted to them pursuant to the phrases of the engagement settlement,” the corporate wrote. “CFS submitted the very best bid on the Public Sale within the quantity of $10,000.”
Lanterman briefly responded to a listing of questions on his background (and up to date coronary heart prognosis) on March 24, saying he would ship detailed replies the next day. These replies by no means materialized. As a substitute, Lanterman forwarded a latest memo he wrote to the courtroom that attacked Harrington and mentioned his accuser was solely attempting to take out a competitor. He has not responded to additional requests for remark.
“Once I attended Upsala, I used to be a commuter scholar who lived with my grandparents in Morristown, New Jersey roughly half-hour away from Upsala Faculty,” Lanterman defined to the choose (PDF) overseeing a separate ongoing case (PDF) by which he has testified. “With restricted assets, I didn’t take part in campus social occasions, nor did I attend commencement ceremonies. In 2023, I confirmed with Felician College — which maintains Upsala Faculty’s data — that they may not find my transcripts or diploma, a scenario that they indicated was probably on account of unresolved money-related points.”
Lanterman was ordered to look in courtroom on April 3 within the case defended by Perkins Coie, however he didn’t present up. As a substitute, he despatched a message to the choose withdrawing from the case.
“I’m 60 years outdated,” Lanterman advised the choose. “I created my enterprise from nothing. I’m accomplished coping with the likes of people like Sean Harrington. And fairly frankly, I’ve been planning at turning over my enterprise to my kids for years. That point has arrived.”
Lanterman’s letter leaves the impression that it was his choice to retire. However in line with an affidavit (PDF) filed in a Florida case on March 28, Mark Lanterman’s son Sean mentioned he’d made the troublesome choice to ask his dad to step down given all of the damaging media consideration.
Mark Rasch, a former federal cybercrime prosecutor who now serves as counsel to the New York cybersecurity intelligence agency Unit 221B, mentioned that if an skilled witness is discredited, any defendants who misplaced instances that have been strongly influenced by that skilled’s conclusions at trial might have grounds for attraction.
Rasch mentioned regulation corporations who suggest an skilled witness have an obligation in good religion to vet that skilled’s {qualifications}, understanding that these credentials can be topic to cross-examination.
“Federal guidelines of civil process and proof each require consultants to record each case they’ve testified in as an skilled for the previous few years,” Rasch mentioned. “A part of that due diligence is pulling up the outcomes of these instances and seeing what the character of their testimony has been.”
Maybe essentially the most well-publicized case involving vital forensic findings from Lanterman was the 2018 conviction of Stephen Allwine, who was discovered responsible of killing his spouse two years earlier after makes an attempt at hiring a hitman on the darkish web fell via. Allwine is serving a sentence of life in jail, and continues to take care of that he was framed, casting doubt on laptop forensic proof discovered on 64 digital units taken from his dwelling.
On March 24, Allwine petitioned a Minnesota courtroom (PDF) to revisit his case, citing the accusations in opposition to Lanterman and his position as a key witness for the prosecution.
